Strokes And Peg Tubes: A Necessary Intervention

A stroke can cause dysphagia, or swallowing difficulties, in patients, which may lead to malnutrition. To prevent this, doctors may recommend a feeding tube. A Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube is often placed for dysphagia following a stroke to maintain sufficient caloric intake. PEG tubes are considered a more secure method of feeding stroke patients who require long-term nutritional support, but they are an invasive procedure that can result in complications.

PEG tubes are placed through the abdomen to the stomach and are used long-term

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are placed through the abdomen and into the stomach, and are used to provide long-term nutritional support to patients who are unable to meet their nutritional requirements through oral intake. This may be due to difficulty swallowing, an eating disorder, or other feeding issues. PEG tubes are often placed following a stroke to maintain sufficient caloric intake for patients with dysphagia, a common condition that affects a patient's ability to swallow.

PEG tubes are placed using a minimally invasive surgical procedure, and are considered more secure than nasogastric (NG) tubes, which are placed through the nose and are used for short-term feeding. PEG tubes are more suitable for patients who require longer-term nutritional support, as they are less likely to be dislodged by agitated and confused patients. However, the placement of a PEG tube is an invasive procedure that can result in complications, and may increase the risk of morbidity and mortality.

The timing of PEG tube placement following a stroke is important, as early placement (within 7 days) may reduce hospital length of stay, while delayed placement (after 7 days) is recommended to allow for the potential recovery of swallowing function. Studies have shown that early PEG tube placement is safe and does not increase the risk of mortality or complications compared to delayed placement. However, delayed PEG tube placement is recommended to allow for an assessment of the patient's swallowing function, as some patients may recover their ability to swallow within the first four weeks after a stroke.

The decision to place a PEG tube should be made by a multidisciplinary team, taking into consideration the patient's individual needs and condition. PEG tubes provide a way to ensure that patients receive adequate nutrition, fluids, and medication, while also considering their quality of life and comfort.

PEG tubes are recommended for patients who are unable to resume oral feeding after 2-3 weeks

Swallowing difficulties, or dysphagia, are a common consequence of strokes, affecting over 65% of patients. This can lead to malnutrition, which has serious implications for a patient's health status and recovery. As such, many stroke patients require enteral nutrition, which can be provided through a nasogastric (NG) tube or a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube.

NG tubes are recommended for short-term feeding and can be placed at a patient's bedside. However, they can be easily dislodged by agitated and confused patients, which may lead to fatal complications.

PEG tubes, on the other hand, are recommended for patients who are unable to resume oral feeding after 2-3 weeks. This is because PEG tubes are considered a more secure method of feeding for patients who require longer-term nutritional support. However, PEG tube placement is an invasive procedure and can result in complications that increase the risk of morbidity and mortality.

The decision to place a PEG tube should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the patient's clinical situation, diagnosis, prognosis, and ethical issues. While early PEG tube placement (<7 days post-stroke) has been associated with a reduced length of hospital stay, there is weak evidence suggesting that delaying PEG tube placement for two weeks may be beneficial, as half of patients with dysphagia improve within this time.

PEG tubes are considered more secure for long-term feeding but carry a higher risk of morbidity and mortality

A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is a secure method of feeding stroke patients who require long-term nutritional support. However, the procedure is invasive and can lead to complications, increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality.

PEG tubes are considered more secure than nasogastric (NG) tubes for long-term feeding. NG tubes are placed in the nose and threaded down the throat into the stomach. They are suitable for short-term feeding but can be easily dislodged by agitated and confused patients, which may lead to fatal complications. In contrast, PEG tubes are placed directly into the abdomen, bypassing the mouth and throat entirely. This makes them a more secure option for long-term feeding, as they cannot be easily dislodged.

However, the insertion of a PEG tube is an invasive procedure that carries risks. The 2011 ASGE guidelines recommend delaying PEG tube placement for two weeks, as half of patients with dysphagia improve within this time. Early placement of a PEG tube (<7 days post-stroke) may be considered to meet requirements for timely discharge to rehab facilities, but this approach is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality.

Studies have shown that early PEG tube placement can lead to higher mortality rates and an increased number of patients with poor outcomes. One study found that patients with a PEG tube were more likely to have a higher mortality rate and were more likely to be living in institutions, indicating a reduced quality of life. Another study found that early PEG tube placement was associated with a higher risk of developing pressure sores, possibly due to reduced mobility and different nursing approaches.

In addition to the risk of morbidity and mortality, there are other challenges associated with the use of PEG tubes for enteral nutrition. These include the risk of stoma site infection, overgranulation, and buried bumper syndrome.

While PEG tubes are considered more secure for long-term feeding, the invasive nature of the procedure and the associated risks mean that there is a higher risk of morbidity and mortality compared to NG tubes.

Nasogastric tubes are recommended for short-term feeding as they are easily placed at the bedside

A nasogastric tube (NG tube) is a thin, flexible plastic tube that is inserted through the nose and into the stomach. It is used for short-term feeding and can deliver nutrition and medication directly to the stomach. They are often recommended for patients who are unable to eat and drink enough to stay healthy, such as those with difficulty swallowing, digestive problems, or those who need extra calories.

NG tubes are easily placed at the bedside and do not require surgery, making them a quick and safe option for short-term feeding. The procedure for inserting an NG tube is straightforward. First, the tube is measured and lubricated. It is then inserted into the nostril and guided down the oesophagus into the stomach. The correct placement of the tube is then verified, usually through an X-ray or aspirate pH test. The procedure can be performed while the patient is awake, and only takes around 30-45 minutes.

NG tubes are recommended for short-term feeding as they can be used for up to six weeks before requiring removal or replacement with a long-term feeding tube. They are also useful in emergency situations, such as toxic ingestion, when stomach pumping is required. Additionally, NG tubes can be used to relieve pressure or remove poisons from the stomach.

However, there are some disadvantages to NG tubes. They can cause discomfort and irritation to the nose and throat, and there is a risk of the tube becoming dislodged or entangled. Nevertheless, NG tubes are a valuable option for short-term feeding, especially in situations where surgery is not feasible or desired.

Nasogastric tubes can be dislodged by agitated and confused patients

Nasogastric Tubes and Agitated, Confused Patients

Nasogastric tubes (NGTs) are a common method of providing nutrition, hydration, and medication to patients who have suffered a stroke and are unable to swallow. However, NGTs present certain challenges, one of which is their ease of dislodgement by agitated and confused patients. This can lead to serious, potentially fatal complications.

Insertion and Dislodgement Challenges

Insertion of an NGT in patients following a stroke is complex due to their communication difficulties, inability to swallow, and possible confusion. This can make it difficult to insert the tube, which is threaded through the nose, down the throat, and into the oesophagus, where it rests in the stomach.

Once inserted, NGTs can be easily dislodged by agitated and confused patients. This is a serious issue, as it can lead to potentially fatal complications.

Preventing Dislodgement

To prevent dislodgement, various techniques can be used, such as tapes, hand mittens, and nasal bridles. While hand mittens and nasal bridles may be effective, they require careful consideration of the patient's best interests and informed consent. Tape is a more widely accepted approach, although it may be less effective in securing the tube.

Staff must be trained to understand all the issues regarding safe and ethical practice when securing NGTs.

Alternative Options

As NGTs present challenges in insertion and dislodgement, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube may be considered for patients who require longer-term nutritional support. A PEG tube is placed directly into the abdomen, providing a more secure method of feeding. However, it is an invasive procedure that can result in complications, and it may increase the risk of morbidity and mortality after a stroke.

The decision to use an NGT or PEG tube should be made by a multidisciplinary team, considering the patient's individual needs and circumstances.

Frequently asked questions